Forrest Industries, Inc.

18 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.
381 U.S. 676 (1965) Cited 242 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 times
Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Telegraphers v. Chicago N.W. R. Co.
362 U.S. 330 (1960) Cited 140 times
Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia
Labor Board v. Crompton Mills
337 U.S. 217 (1949) Cited 102 times
Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
N.L.R.B. v. Rapid Bindery, Inc.
293 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 48 times
In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.
N.L.R.B. v. American Manufacturing Co. of Texas
351 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1965) Cited 36 times
Subcontracting motivated by desire to escape union
N.L.R.B. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
361 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 27 times
Holding that employer not "relieved of its duty to obey the order to bargain during the pendency of the proceedings to enforce the earlier order"
N.L.R.B. v. Central Illinois Public Serv. Co.
324 F.2d 916 (7th Cir. 1963) Cited 25 times
Upholding award of prejudgment interest under § 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act

Forrest Industries, Inc.

18 Cited authorities

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia

Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.

Subcontracting motivated by desire to escape union

Holding that employer not "relieved of its duty to obey the order to bargain during the pendency of the proceedings to enforce the earlier order"

Upholding award of prejudgment interest under § 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act