§

Formfit/Rogers Co.

164 N.L.R.B. 1 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Formfit/Rogers Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Joclin Manufacturing Company

    314 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Joclin Mfg. Co., 314 F.2d 627, 631-32 (2 Cir. 1963), we recognized that the Board's discretion in determining whether or not to hold a hearing was not unfettered, but we held that it could condition the right to a hearing on the existence of substantial and material issues: "[This] requirement [is] not only proper but necessary to prevent dilatory tactics by employers or unions disappointed in the election returns."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.

    297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. American Steel Buck

    227 F.2d 927 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 7 times

    No. 50, Docket 23577. Argued October 13, 1955. Decided December 1, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Elizabeth W. Weston and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Raphael, Searles, Levin Vischi, New York City (Sidney O. Raphael, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before FRANK, HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. As the facts are fully stated in the Board's decision, reported in 110 N.L.R.B. No. 265, we shall not repeat them