§

Forest Industries Co.

164 N.L.R.B. 1092 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Forest Industries Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Brown v. Board of Education

    347 U.S. 483 (1954)   Cited 2,665 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Comfort, Inc.

    365 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times

    No. 18210. September 13, 1966. Rehearing Denied October 11, 1966. Richard S. Rodin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington D.C., were with him on the brief. Bailey C. Webber, Ottumwa, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and MATTHES and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges. MATTHES

  4. Montgomery Ward Co. v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 889 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times
    In Montgomery Ward, for instance, the court modified an order that applied to all the company's plants because there was "no evidence presented... of any national pattern of unfair labor practices."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  6. United Steelwork. of Am. Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 19492, 19507. Argued March 22, 1966. Decided May 19, 1966. Certiorari Denied October 10, 1966. See 87 S.Ct. 90. Mr. Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Elliot Bredhoff, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19,492. Mr. Donald C. Winson, Pittsburgh, Pa., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Bartholomew A. Diggins, Daniel W. Sixbey, Washington, D.C., and Paul R. Obert, Pittsburgh, Pa.,

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Swinerton

    202 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times

    No. 13303. February 17, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Finding, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston and Abraham Siegel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gardiner Johnson, Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for respondents Swinerton, Jabez Burns Sons, and others. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order requiring

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Tidelands Marine Service, Inc.

    338 F.2d 44 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times
    In Tidelands Marine Service, a crew of thirteen was laid off and not rehired, the asserted reason being that they had failed to advise the Company as to how they could be recalled.