§
Forenta, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Hobart Brothers Company

    372 F.2d 203 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 14 times
    In Hobart itself, in a portion of the Sixth Circuit opinion that Southwire chose not to quote, the court indicated that surrounding circumstances could transform otherwise "sound advice" into an implicit threat.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Sparton Manufacturing Company

    355 F.2d 523 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times

    No. 15267. January 26, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul M. Thompson, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph A. Yocum, Arthur R. Donovan, Harry P. Dees, Evansville, Ind., for respondent, Kahn, Dees, Donovan Kahn, Evansville, Ind., of counsel. Before DUFFY, SWYGERT and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This case is here upon the Labor Board's petition

  4. Section 141 - Short title; Congressional declaration of purpose and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 141   Cited 2,060 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Stating Congress' declaration of purpose that "employers, employees, and labor organizations each recognize under law one another's legitimate rights in their relations with each other"