Food for Less

9 Cited authorities

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
  2. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  3. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  4. Gilbert v. K.T.I., Inc.

    765 S.W.2d 289 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 31 times
    Relying on a Missouri Supreme Court case decided in 1910, holding that an easement is a nonpossessory interest, and an easement owner seeking a court's protection of the easement may not bring an action such as trespass which is traditionally for the protection of possessory interests
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Scot, Inc.

    39 F.3d 678 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 14 times
    Finding reversible error where the burden was incorrectly placed on the employer
  6. Johnson Hardin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    49 F.3d 237 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 9 times
    Finding employer violated § 8 by ousting peaceful handbillers who weren't interfering with the employer's use of the nonexclusive easement for ingress and egress to its premises
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 571

    624 F.2d 846 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 4 times

    No. 79-1650. Submitted February 14, 1980. Decided July 3, 1980. W. Christian Schumann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, Kenneth B. Hipp, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Ruth E. Peters, Atty., Norton J. Come, Acting Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. David D. Weinberg, Weinberg Weinberg, Omaha, Neb., for respondent. Before LAY, Chief Judge

  8. Winslow v. Sauerwein

    285 S.W.2d 21 (Mo. Ct. App. 1956)   Cited 18 times
    Abutting property owner could be properly restrained from trespass of private drive to access his property
  9. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Riss

    319 S.W.2d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 1959)   Cited 10 times

    No. 22878. December 1, 1958. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 12, 1959. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, JACKSON COUNTY, J. DONALD MURPHY, J. Gresham, Boughan Whipple, Kansas City, for appellant. Spencer, Fane, Britt Browne, Kansas City, for respondent. CAVE, Judge. We adopt the preliminary statement of the case by the Supreme Court, without quotes. Since 1921, the Kansas City Power Light Company has maintained poles and electrical transmission lines across a tract