§

Food & Commercial Workers Local P-9 (Hormel & Co.)

281 N.L.R.B. 986 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Food & Commercial Workers Local P-9 (Hormel & Co.)

6 Cited authorities

  1. Longshoremen v. Allied International, Inc.

    456 U.S. 212 (1982)   Cited 74 times
    Finding foreseeability relevant in determining damages, and rejecting argument that union did not foresee that refusing to handle a shipper's cargo would result in disruption of the shipper's business as facially implausible

  2. Labor Board v. Servette

    377 U.S. 46 (1964)   Cited 74 times
    Holding under section 8(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b), that statutory protection for the distribution of handbills would be undermined if a threat to engage in protected conduct were not itself protected

  3. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    463 U.S. 147 (1983)   Cited 21 times
    Vacating and remanding for consideration of statutory question

  4. Vulcan Materials Co. v. United Steelworkers of America

    430 F.2d 446 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 61 times

    No. 28359. July 22, 1970. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 18, 1970. Benj. L. Erdreich, Jerome A. Cooper, Cooper, Mictch Crawford, Birmingham, Ala., Michael H. Gottesman, Bredhoff, Gottesman Cohen, Washington, D.C., Bernard Kleiman, Gen. Counsel, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants-appellants. John J. Coleman, Jr., A.H. Gaede, Jr., Birmingham Ala., for plaintiff-appellee; James William Lewis, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Before DYER, SIMPSON and MORGAN

  5. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    662 F.2d 264 (4th Cir. 1981)   Cited 4 times
    In Edward J. DeBartolo v. NLRB, 662 F.2d 264, 268, (4th Cir. 1981), rev'd on other grounds, 463 U.S. 147, 103 S.Ct. 2926, 77 L.Ed.2d 535 (1982), the Fourth Circuit held that omission in the handbill of the secondary employer's relationship to the primary dispute is, standing alone, not evidence of the union's intent to deceive.

  6. Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    356 F.2d 434 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 10 times
    In Great Western Broadcasting Corp. v. NLRB, 356 F.2d 434, 436 (CA9), enf'g 150 N.L.R.B. 467 (1964), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1002 (1966), the court upheld the Board's determination that the handbilling there fell within the publicity proviso and thus was not unlawful, but it stated in dictum that § 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) covered the union activity.