Food & Commercial Workers Local 1996 (Visiting Nurse Health System)

25 Cited authorities

Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council
467 U.S. 837 (1984) Cited 16,211 times 616 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
Bailey v. United States
516 U.S. 137 (1995) Cited 2,782 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that Government must show active employment of firearm to support § 924(c) conviction
Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain
503 U.S. 249 (1992) Cited 2,746 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 1292 applies also to bankruptcy jurisdiction and is not displaced by § 158(d)
Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
504 U.S. 374 (1992) Cited 1,746 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that guidelines on airfare advertising were "related to" the rates, routes, or services of an air carrier given that every guideline makes "express reference to [air]fares"
Leedom v. Kyne
358 U.S. 184 (1958) Cited 727 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to strike down agency orders made in excess of the agency's delegated powers
Railroad Trainmen v. Terminal Co.
394 U.S. 369 (1969) Cited 369 times
Holding that state court could not issue injunction against peaceful strike sought by third-party railroad terminal operator to avoid economic damages from shutdown of terminal
Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 392 (1996) Cited 136 times
Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Labor Board v. Fruit Packers
377 U.S. 58 (1964) Cited 236 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 186 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

Food & Commercial Workers Local 1996 (Visiting Nurse Health System)

25 Cited authorities

Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

Holding that Government must show active employment of firearm to support § 924(c) conviction

Holding that § 1292 applies also to bankruptcy jurisdiction and is not displaced by § 158(d)

Holding that guidelines on airfare advertising were "related to" the rates, routes, or services of an air carrier given that every guideline makes "express reference to [air]fares"

Holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to strike down agency orders made in excess of the agency's delegated powers

Holding that state court could not issue injunction against peaceful strike sought by third-party railroad terminal operator to avoid economic damages from shutdown of terminal

Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site