Food and Commercial Workers (Safeway)

13 Cited authorities

Communications Workers of America v. Beck
487 U.S. 735 (1988) Cited 277 times 44 Legal Analyses
Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
Labor Board v. General Motors
373 U.S. 734 (1963) Cited 190 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.
525 U.S. 813 (1998) Cited 44 times 2 Legal Analyses
No. 97-1846. October 5, 1998. ORDERS C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 130 F. 3d 1101.
United Paperworkers Int'l. Union v. Buzenius
525 U.S. 979 (1998) Cited 21 times
No. 97-945. November 9, 1998. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Marquez v. Screen Actors, ante, p. 33. Reported below: 124 F. 3d 788.
N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.
596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 101 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"
International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998) Cited 24 times 2 Legal Analyses
Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"
Penrod v. N.L.R.B
203 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Cited 13 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that Hudson requires a union to explain how its affiliate used money that was ultimately charged to the nonmembers
Sheet Metal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. N.L.R.B
716 F.2d 1249 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 26 times
Holding summary judgment should be denied "where the movant's papers are insufficient on their face or themselves demonstrate the existence of a material issue of fact"
Production Workers Union of Chicago & Vicinity, Local 707 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
161 F.3d 1047 (7th Cir. 1998) Cited 8 times
Explaining that appellate court cannot review an argument first raised on appeal unless "extraordinary circumstances" are present
Local No. 111 v. N.L.R.B
946 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir. 1991) Cited 10 times
Finding that 42 years of congressional inaction with regards to a National Labor Relations Board rule "can be read as endorsement of the Board's exercise of discretion" rather than "approval of a restriction" in the Board's authority

Food and Commercial Workers (Safeway)

13 Cited authorities

Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"

Holding that Hudson requires a union to explain how its affiliate used money that was ultimately charged to the nonmembers

Holding summary judgment should be denied "where the movant's papers are insufficient on their face or themselves demonstrate the existence of a material issue of fact"

Explaining that appellate court cannot review an argument first raised on appeal unless "extraordinary circumstances" are present

Finding that 42 years of congressional inaction with regards to a National Labor Relations Board rule "can be read as endorsement of the Board's exercise of discretion" rather than "approval of a restriction" in the Board's authority