§

Florence Printing Co.

145 N.L.R.B. 141 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Florence Printing Co.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.

    121 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 85 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kobritz

    193 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1951)   Cited 43 times
    Upholding an NLRB departure from a policy of declining to assert jurisdiction, on the ground that "the Board had jurisdiction all the time"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941)   Cited 39 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 118 F.2d 874, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 595, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1549, it was held that an employer's insistence on a provision in a contract with a bargaining agent, that during the period of the contract or at any future time the employees and the union would not request or demand a closed shop agreement or check-off system, warranted the National Labor Relations Board in inferring that the employer was not actuated by a genuine desire to reach an accord with the bargaining representative.

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Jackson Press

    201 F.2d 541 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10702. January 29, 1953. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Louis Schwartz, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John H. Doesburg, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taitel

    261 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12335. October 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sheldon M. Charone, Atty., Chicago, Ill., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Robert J. Wilson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Circuit Judge, and WHAM, District Judge. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Decker

    296 F.2d 338 (8th Cir. 1961)   Cited 13 times

    No. 16738. November 14, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel-Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. John H. Mitchell, Fort Dodge, Iowa, made argument for respondent and was on the brief. Before SANBORN, MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges. RIDGE, Circuit Judge. This

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Barney's Supercenter, Inc.

    296 F.2d 91 (3d Cir. 1961)   Cited 12 times

    No. 13596. Argued October 5, 1961. Decided November 16, 1961. Marion L. Griffin, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jack J. Rosenberg, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") seeks enforcement of an order