Flav-O-Rich, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
  3. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  4. Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills

    339 U.S. 563 (1950)   Cited 132 times
    Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center

    465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 17 times

    No. 72-1081. August 29, 1972. Bernard Gottfried, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome H. Brooks, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner. Donald G. Schiff, Southfield, Mich., for appellee. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and MILLER, Circuit Judges. WILLIAM E. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order directing the respondent, the Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc.,

  6. Flav-O-Rich, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    531 F.2d 358 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing final NLRB decision
  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. S.H. Kress Co.

    194 F.2d 444 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 6 times

    No. 11266. February 21, 1952. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, NLRB., Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Samuel M. Singer, and Robert G. Johnson, all of Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Martin I. Rose, New York City, N.Y., Martin I. Rose, New York City, on brief; Martin I. Rose, New York City, John J. Larkin, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for respondent. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and MILLER, Circuit Judges. HICKS