Flat Dog Productions, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit
  2. United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical

    810 F.2d 726 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 421 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "requiring proof of personal ownership or actual physical possession of hazardous substances as a precondition of liability . . . would be inconsistent with the broad remedial purposes of CERCLA"
  3. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason
  4. Donsco, Inc. v. Casper Corp.

    587 F.2d 602 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 285 times
    Holding that a corporate officer could be individually liable for unfair competition and false advertising
  5. Labor Board v. Deena Artware

    361 U.S. 398 (1960)   Cited 139 times
    Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Greater Kansas City Roofing

    2 F.3d 1047 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 97 times
    Holding it was error to hold sole shareholder personally liable for judgment against corporation she controlled because that there was no evidence to suggest her disregard for many corporate formalities constituted fraud or was done to cause the company to be less able to pay a judgment
  7. Contractors, Laborers, Teamsters, v. Hroch

    757 F.2d 184 (8th Cir. 1985)   Cited 54 times
    Allowing veil piercing because owner used subsidiary "in an inequitable fashion to avoid its obligations"
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Emsing's Supermarket, Inc.

    872 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 32 times
    Granting enforcement of an NLRB order to an employer to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, including failing to make certain contractual payments after a CBA's expiration, and noting that "[a]n employer may not make changes in the terms and conditions of employment reflected in an expired [CBA; i]nstead, the employer must maintain the status quo after the expiration of a [CBA] until a new agreement is reached or until the parties bargain in good faith to impasse"
  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. I.W.G

    144 F.3d 685 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 96-9548, 96-9550. May 18, 1998. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (Nos. 27-CA-11771 and 27 CA-11870 for Case No. 96-9548) and (322 NLRB No. 12 for Case No. 96-9550). Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. James W. Bain (Peter A. Gergely with him on Petitioner Gordon's Opening Brief), Brega Winters P.C., Denver, Colorado, for Robert B. Gordon. Vincent J. Falvo, Jr., Attorney (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel;

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. West Dixie Enterprises, Inc.

    190 F.3d 1191 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 3 times

    No. 98-5192 Non-Argument Calendar DECIDED July 20, 1999. John D. Burgoyne, Acting Deputy Associate General Counsel, Frederick C. Havad, Christopher W. Young, NLRB, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Ira Hatch, Vero Beach, FL, for Respondents. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, (July 20, 1999). D.C. Docket No. 12-CA-16716. Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: West Dixie Enterprises, Inc. and Carole Ann and Paul Paolicelli appeal the

  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,213 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”