§

First Legal Support Services, LLC

342 N.L.R.B. 350 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
First Legal Support Services, LLC

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 326 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    632 F.2d 208 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "hallmark" violations of NLRA "include such employer misbehavior as the closing of a plant or threats of plant closure or loss of employment, the grant of benefits to employees, or the reassignment, demotion or discharge of union adherents" and lesser violations "include such employer misconduct as interrogating employees regarding their union sympathies, holding out a `carrot' of promised benefits, expressing anti-union resolve, threatening that unionization will result in decreased benefits, or suggesting that physical force might be used to exclude the union"

  5. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  6. Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 1292 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that the NLRB possessed substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that a supervisor violated § 158 when he told employees that he heard from ownership that unionization would lead to the owners shutting down the plant

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Horizon Air Services, Inc.

    761 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1985)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming bargaining order because the egregious actions of the employer "constitute a more than ample basis for a sound inference of future interference and/or enduring aftereffects"

  8. Weather Tamer, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    676 F.2d 483 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 17 times
    In Weather Tamer there was no daily contact between the employees being terminated and those remaining, rather there was only a single conversation between management and a non-terminated employee in which the closing was linked with anti-union animus.

  9. Royal Coach Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    838 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 114, 316, Dockets 87-4036, 87-4056. Argued September 30, 1987. Decided January 27, 1988. Joseph S. Rosenthal, New York City (Bondy Schloss, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Michael David Fox, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent. Petition

  10. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    527 F.2d 803 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 74-1608, 74-1668. Argued September 9, 1975. Decided December 8, 1975. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 13, 1976. Ann Neydon, New York City, for petitioner in No. 74-1608 and intervenor in No. 74-1668. Arthur M. Goldberg and George Kaufman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner in No. 74-1608 and intervenor in No. 74-1668. John F. Depenbrock, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy

  11. Section 151 - Definitions; short title

    45 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 2,960 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Defining "minor dispute" as disputes "growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements covering rates of pay, rules, or working conditions."

  12. Rule 1003 - Admissibility of Duplicates

    Fed. R. Evid. 1003   Cited 502 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Permitting duplicates