Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.

72 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Co.
282 U.S. 555 (1931) Cited 1,111 times
Holding that although damages must be "the certain result of the wrong," they may be "uncertain in respect of their amount."
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Eichel v. New York Central R. Co.
375 U.S. 253 (1963) Cited 266 times
Holding that evidence of disability payments was inadmissible in a Federal Employers' Liability Act action
Nathanson v. Labor Board
344 U.S. 25 (1952) Cited 279 times
Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Virginia Electric Co. v. Board
319 U.S. 533 (1943) Cited 326 times
Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"
Labor Board v. Gullett Gin Co.
340 U.S. 361 (1951) Cited 211 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act
Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.
306 U.S. 240 (1939) Cited 281 times
In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.

72 Cited authorities

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that although damages must be "the certain result of the wrong," they may be "uncertain in respect of their amount."

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

Holding that evidence of disability payments was inadmissible in a Federal Employers' Liability Act action

Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act

In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.