Ferrell-Hicks Chevrolet, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Mitchell v. Huntsville Wholesale Nurseries

    267 F.2d 286 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that the processing by a farmer of commodities of other farmers is incidental to, or in conjunction with, the farming operations of those other farmers and therefore not within the definition of agriculture
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Olaa Sugar Co.

    242 F.2d 714 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 13 times

    No. 15143. March 12, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna Blake, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur G. Smith, Smith, Wild, Beebe Cades, J. Edward Collins, James A. King, Bouslog Symonds, Honolulu, Hawaii, and George Andersen, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges. POPE, Circuit Judge. Before us is the petition

  3. Chapman v. Durkin

    214 F.2d 360 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that hauling fruit away from a farm "cannot be said to be work performed ... on a farm"
  4. Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Durkin

    214 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 6 times
    Rejecting argument that employees who worked off a farm were agricultural workers because their work was "necessary to the maintenance and operation" of employer's business that gathered fruit from farms