17 Cited authorities
John Wiley Sons v. Livingston
376 U.S. 543 (1964) Cited 1,773 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 734 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 301 timesHolding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
N.L.R.B. v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.
276 F.2d 303 (5th Cir. 1960) Cited 36 timesNo. 17965. March 25, 1960. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1960. Melvin Pollack, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., John W. Wilcox, Jr. (of Wilson, Branch Barwick), Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. In this case, as in National Labor Relations
McGuire v. Humble Oil Refining Company
355 F.2d 352 (2d Cir. 1966) Cited 27 timesIn McGuire, as in Wiley, employees sought arbitration against a successor employer; this court found compelling against arbitration the considerations that possible preferential awards to those employees might cause "unrest and dissatisfaction" among other employees, and that such arbitration might constitute the unfair labor practice of bargaining with a group other than the certified bargaining representative.
N.L.R.B. v. Downtown Bakery Corp.
330 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1964) Cited 28 timesIn Downtown Bakery, the court upheld the policy of the NLRB that the employer, faced with competing demands for recognition, violated sections 8(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Act by executing and maintaining a collective bargaining agreement with a rival union.
N.L.R.B. v. McFarland
306 F.2d 219 (10th Cir. 1962) Cited 28 timesNo. 6801. June 22, 1962. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoll and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. John F. Lee, Salt Lake City, Utah (Peter W. Billings, Salt Lake City, Utah, was with him on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. By this petition, the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order requiring Respondent-McFarland
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armato
199 F.2d 800 (7th Cir. 1952) Cited 38 timesNo. 10691. November 19, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx and Clark M. Robertson, Robertson Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions
N.L.R.B. v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc.
273 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 22 timesNo. 17764. December 29, 1959. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Theo. F. Weiss, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The question for decision is whether the respondent is a successor employer, for the purpose of
Afl-Cio v. N. L. R. B
720 F.2d 664 (3d Cir. 1983)No. 82-3502. July 6, 1983. N.L.R.B. DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED; ORDER ENFORCED.