§

FCH Enterprises, Inc. v. Basile Douvris

No. 92047334 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 27, 2008)
FCH Enterprises, Inc. v. Basile Douvris

6 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 221,408 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  2. Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.R.L

    808 F.2d 46 (Fed. Cir. 1986)   Cited 52 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming TTAB's cancellation of trademark for fraudulently obtaining registration

  3. Opryland USA v. Great American Music Show

    970 F.2d 847 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 24 times
    In Opryland, Opryland USA opposed the registration of "THE CAROLINA OPRY," arguing that the term was confusingly similar to Opryland's own marks.

  4. Morehouse Mfg. Corp. v. J. Strickland

    407 F.2d 881 (C.C.P.A. 1969)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Morehouse Mfg. Corp. v. J. Strickland Co., 407 F.2d 881, 888-89, 160 USPQ 715, 721 (CCPA 1969) the court stated that false suggestion requires the existence of likelihood of confusion.

  5. In re Mother Tucker's Food Experience

    925 F.2d 1402 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to comply with statutory requirements is not curable nunc pro tunc

  6. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 337,447 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit