§
FCA US LLC

12 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 227 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Rashkind v. Marrero

    450 U.S. 913 (1981)   Cited 163 times
    Finding violation of Fourth Amendment rights sufficient

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  5. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs

  6. Am. Baptist Homes Business v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    858 F.3d 612 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15-1445 C/w 15-1501 06-06-2017 AMERICAN BAPTIST HOMES OF THE WEST, doing business as Piedmont Gardens, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare Workers–West, Intervenor David S. Durham argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Christopher M. Foster, San Francisco, CA. Kellie J. Isbell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin

  7. Hyundai Am. Shipping Agency, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    805 F.3d 309 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 2 times
    Declining to endorse the Board's "novel view" but holding that Hyundai's rule prohibiting discussion of all matters under investigation "was so broad and undifferentiated that the Board reasonably concluded that Hyundai did not present a legitimate business justification for it"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.

    763 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production

  10. E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co. v. N.L.R.B

    744 F.2d 536 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 82-1767, 82-1903. Argued April 3, 1984. Decided September 26, 1984. Alan G. Burton, argued, E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co., Legal Dept., Wilmington, Del., George E. Yund, Frost Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, L. Pay Wynns, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON, District Judge. The Honorable Benjamin F. Gibson, United

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"