§

Farwest Fibers, Inc.

331 N.L.R.B. 950 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Farwest Fibers, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Del Rey Tortilleria, Inc.

    787 F.2d 1118 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 20 times

    No. 85-1199. Argued January 7, 1986. Decided April 2, 1986. Joseph Oertel, Dep. Assoc. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Irving M. Geslewitz, Adams, Fox, Adelstein Rosen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WOOD and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) petitions this court to enforce an order requiring respondent

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc.

    942 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    No. 89-2795. Argued January 14, 1991. Decided September 4, 1991. Barbara A. Atkin, Judith P. Flower, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, William A. Baudler (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Solien, N.L.R.B., Region 14, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Gary A. Wincek (argued), William L. Becker, Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, Ill., Nancy M. Watkins, Wilburn, Suggs Watkins, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Centeno Super Markets, Inc.

    555 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1977)

    No. 76-1577. July 5, 1977. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 26, 1977. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Jay Shanklin, Supervisor, Charles Shaw, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George P. Parker, Jr., John N. McCamish, Jr., C.J. Fitzpatrick, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for other interested parties. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas