§
Farr Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Sonicraft, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    905 F.2d 146 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 19 times
    Applying Redd-I

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Vought Corp.—MLRS Systems Division

    788 F.2d 1378 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    No. 85-1271. Submitted November 15, 1985. Decided April 21, 1986. John B. Shepard, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Jesse Gill, of the N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order which found that Vought Corporation — MLRS Systems Division (the Company) committed several violations of sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3)

  5. N.L.R.B. v. a T Mfg. Co.

    738 F.2d 148 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 10 times

    No. 83-5307. Argued April 5, 1984. Decided June 29, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., William R. Stewart, Allison W. Brown, argued, Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Blake Page, argued, Page, Clay Thomas, Winchester, Ky., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. CONTIE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) applies for enforcement

  6. Baptist Medical System v. N.L.R.B

    876 F.2d 661 (8th Cir. 1989)   Cited 5 times
    In Baptist Medical System the NLRB had concluded, just as it did in the case at bar, that a hospital could not prevent nonemployee union organizers from using the hospital's public restaurant to solicit support for the union as long as this activity was not disruptive of the hospital's business.

  7. Baker Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    759 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1985)   Cited 3 times

    No. 84-4522. Summary Calendar. May 9, 1985. Sewell Riggs, Daniel O. Goforth, N. Carlene Rhodes, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent-cross petitioner. Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Regional Director, Bob Casey, Houston, Tex., for other interested parties. On petition for review and cross application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GARWOOD, and

  8. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  9. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,061 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

  10. Section 102.118 - Present and former Board employees prohibited from producing documents and testifying; production of witnesses' statements after direct testimony

    29 C.F.R. § 102.118   Cited 57 times

    (a)Prohibition on producing files and documents. Except as provided in § 102.117 respecting requests cognizable under the Freedom of Information Act, no present or former employee or specially designated agent of the Agency will produce or present any files, documents, reports, memoranda, or records of the Board or of the General Counsel, whether in response to a subpoena duces tecum or otherwise, without the written consent of the Board or the Chairman of the Board if the document is in Washington