§

Farmingdale Iron Works, Inc.

249 N.L.R.B. 98 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Farmingdale Iron Works, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,707 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 116 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  4. Shopmen's Loc. U. No. 455 v. Kevin Steel Prod

    519 F.2d 698 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 87 times
    In Kevin Steel, the court also addressed the argument, not presented to us, that businesses will enter bankruptcy proceedings to free themselves of labor agreements.

  5. Electri-Flex Co. v. N.L.R.B

    570 F.2d 1327 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that evidence supported finding that employer instituted new warning system to retaliate against the union

  6. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    476 F.2d 850 (1st Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times
    Reaching similar conclusion where annual wage increase contained both automatic and discretionary elements

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Aurora City Lines, Inc.

    299 F.2d 229 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13465. February 2, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A.I. Mendelsohn, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and H.M. Levy, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Fred M. Petit, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has petitioned under section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Suburban Lumber Co.

    121 F.2d 829 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 27 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Suburban Lumber Co., 3 Cir., 121 F.2d 829 (1941), the de minimis doctrine was urged to defeat the Board's jurisdiction.