Farley Candy Co.
5 Cited authorities
Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 483 (1978) Cited 220 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.
337 U.S. 656 (1949) Cited 88 timesHolding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"
Prill v. N.L.R.B
835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 27 times 8 Legal AnalysesRecognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”
Roseville Dodge, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
882 F.2d 1355 (8th Cir. 1989) Cited 6 timesNo. 88-5319. Submitted March 14, 1989. Decided August 23, 1989. Rehearing Denied September 11, 1989. David R. Hols, Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner. John Fawley, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. GIBSON and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Roseville Dodge seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board decision holding that two separate work stoppages by an unrepresented