§
Famet, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  3. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Medo Photo Supply Corp.

    135 F.2d 279 (2d Cir. 1943)   Cited 7 times

    No. 233. April 28, 1943. Petition of National Labor Relations Board for an enforcement order. Petition granted. Proceedings by National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against Medo Photo Supply Corporation, respondent, on petition for an enforcement order against respondent. Petition granted. Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, Robert Todd McKinlay, and Eugene J. Davidson, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Seligsberg, Friedman Berliner, of New York City (William E. Friedman

  5. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,325 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355