Fabri-Tek, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Garment Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 731 (1961) Cited 213 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
N.L.R.B. v. Power Equipment Company
313 F.2d 438 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 22 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Power Equipment Co., 6 Cir., 313 F.2d 438, employees came to work wearing bowling shirts upon which were placed an emblem of the union.
N.L.R.B. v. Mayrath Company
319 F.2d 424 (7th Cir. 1963) Cited 10 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Mayrath Co., 7 Cir., 319 F.2d 424, employees were told that if they wanted to work at the company's plant they had better take off their union buttons.
Boeing Airplane Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
217 F.2d 369 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 11 times
In Boeing Airplane Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd. (217 F.2d 369, 375-376), the board was reversed and the determination of the trial examiner reinstated where "the Trial Examiner discredited the testimony of Gerber" whereas "The Board gave credibility to Gerber and discredited Morrell".
National Labor Rel. Board v. Power Equip. Co.
319 F.2d 861 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 1 times
No. 14959. July 26, 1963. Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Marcel Mallet-Prevost Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C., Philip Fusco Director, Eighth Region, N.L.R.B. Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. George S. Maxwell, F.O. Burkhalter, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. Before CECIL, Chief Judge, MILLER, Circuit Judge, and BOYD, District Judge. DECREE. This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce
Kimble Glass Company v. Natl. Labor Rel. Board
230 F.2d 484 (6th Cir. 1956) Cited 2 times
No. 12680. February 29, 1956. James M. Guiher, Steptoe Johnson, Clarksburg, W. Va., C.W. Neuhaus, Fred E. Fuller, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case, involving a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board and the Board's cross-petition for enforcement, was heard on the briefs, record and oral argument of counsel. The Board
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Fabri-Tek, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

In N.L.R.B. v. Power Equipment Co., 6 Cir., 313 F.2d 438, employees came to work wearing bowling shirts upon which were placed an emblem of the union.

In N.L.R.B. v. Mayrath Co., 7 Cir., 319 F.2d 424, employees were told that if they wanted to work at the company's plant they had better take off their union buttons.

In Boeing Airplane Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd. (217 F.2d 369, 375-376), the board was reversed and the determination of the trial examiner reinstated where "the Trial Examiner discredited the testimony of Gerber" whereas "The Board gave credibility to Gerber and discredited Morrell".

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"