§

F. W. Woolworth Co.

310 N.L.R.B. 1197 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
F. W. Woolworth Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    968 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 19 times
    In Sparks Nugget, the Ninth Circuit went further by finding that the inaccessibility exception does not apply at all in situations where customers, and not employees, are the target audience; alternatively, the court stated that, even if the exception were applicable, Lechmere would require a finding that the intended audience is presumptively not inaccessible "because the targets of the union protest do not reside on the employer's property."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Colonial Haven Nursing Home, Inc.

    542 F.2d 691 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that "anticipatory photographing. . . . does not violate § 8 of the Act where the photographs are taken to establish for purposes of an injunction suit that pickets engaged in violence"

  6. Jays Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    573 F.2d 438 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that work could be re-contracted for legitimate business reasons, with the effect that discriminatees were placed on an "employment merry-go-round"

  7. United States Steel Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    682 F.2d 98 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that § 8 does not prohibit photography per se, only photography that has a reasonable tendency to coerce

  8. Flambeau Plastics Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times

    No. 16560. August 2, 1968. Certiorari Denied January 13, 1969. See 89 S.Ct. 625. Walter S. Davis, Russ R. Mueller, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Kenneth R. Loebel, Richard M. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., Goldberg, Previant Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy S. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Leon M. Kestenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief

  9. Laclede Gas Company v. N.L.R.B

    421 F.2d 610 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 7 times

    No. 19518. February 4, 1970. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 30, 1970. Harold I. Elbert, of Susman, Willer, Rimmel Elbert, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B. and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B. on the brief. Charles A. Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for intervenor Local 5-6,