ยง

F. W. Woolworth Co.

179 N.L.R.B. 748 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
F. W. Woolworth Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Clearfield Cheese Company

    322 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Clearfield Cheese Co., 322 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1963), for example, the court enforced a bargaining order of the Labor Board based upon findings that a speech and a letter from the employer to his employees conveying a threat that the employer would go out of business if the union prevailed in the election had robbed the employees of free choice.

  3. National Labor R.B. v. Wooster Div., Borg-W

    236 F.2d 898 (6th Cir. 1956)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 12687, 12730. September 12, 1956. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Irving M. Herman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for N.L.R.B. James C. Davis, Cleveland, Ohio, for Wooster Division, of Borg-Warner Corp. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C. (Harold Cranefield, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for International Union, etc. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. These cases are before the