§

F & R Meat Co., Inc.

296 N.L.R.B. 759 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
F & R Meat Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Action Automotive, Inc.

    469 U.S. 490 (1985)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board rule excluding from bargaining unit employees who are relatives of management

  6. Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

  7. United States v. Thompson

    708 F.2d 1294 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that a witness's conclusion that the defendant was involved in the charged conspiracy was admissible under Rule 701

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Campbell-Harris Elec., Inc.

    719 F.2d 292 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 16 times
    Affirming the National Labor Relations Board ("N.L.R.B.") finding that ownership and management of first company, a two-man partnership, was substantially identical to that of second company, a sole proprietorship

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.. v. Alvin J. Bart & Co.

    598 F.2d 1267 (2d Cir. 1979)   Cited 6 times

    No. 500, Docket 78-4115. Argued January 15, 1979. Decided May 21, 1979. Hugh P. Husband, Jr., New York City, for respondent. Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D.C., Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C. (Sandra L. Elligers, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Petition from the National Labor Relations