§

F. M. Homes, Inc.

235 N.L.R.B. 648 (N.L.R.B. 1978)
F. M. Homes, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  5. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

  6. Arizona Public Service Company v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.2d 228 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 25 times
    Reversing Board Order and Decision finding lack of supervisory power

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Phaostron Instrument Elec. Co.

    344 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times

    No. 19505. April 27, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Michael R. Brown, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Erwin Lerten, Potruch Lerten, Beverly Hills, Cal., for respondent. Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge. ELY, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks full enforcement of its Order (146 N.L.R.B. No. 124), issued after a hearing and

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Leprino Cheese Company

    424 F.2d 184 (10th Cir. 1970)   Cited 11 times

    No. 300-69. March 31, 1970. Rehearing Denied May 28, 1970. William Wachter, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Ian D. Lanoff, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John A. Criswell, Englewood, Colo. (John Corbridge, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and HILL and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. HICKEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  9. N.L.R.B. v. I. Posner, Inc.

    304 F.2d 773 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 332, Docket 27342. Submitted April 23, 1962. Decided July 3, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Leo N. McGuire, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Leight, Drimmer Weinstein, New York City, and Murray A. Frank, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Burton H. Zuckerman, New York City, of counsel), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys