§

Exxon Shipping Co.

312 N.L.R.B. 566 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Exxon Shipping Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. Bulk Carriers v. Arguelles

    400 U.S. 351 (1971)   Cited 127 times
    Holding that the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) did not abrogate the Seaman's Wage Act remedy

  2. Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board

    316 U.S. 31 (1942)   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

  3. N.Y. Shipping Ass'n v. Fed. Maritime Com'n

    854 F.2d 1338 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that courts must defer to an agency "interpretation of its own organic legislation" even where there are competing statutory schemes

  4. Section 10502 - Shipping articles agreements

    46 U.S.C. § 10502   Cited 10 times

    (a) The owner, charterer, managing operator, master, or individual in charge shall make a shipping agreement in writing with each seaman before the seaman commences employment. (b) The agreement shall include the date and hour on which the seaman must be on board to begin the voyage. (c) The agreement may not contain a provision on the allotment of wages or a scale of provisions. (d) Each shipping agreement must be signed by the master or individual in charge or a representative of the owner, charterer

  5. Section 10315 - Allotments

    46 U.S.C. § 10315   Cited 4 times

    (a) Under prescribed regulations, a seaman may stipulate as follows in the agreement required by section 10302 of this title for an allotment of any part of the wages the seaman may earn: (1) to the seaman's grandparents, parents, spouse, sister, brother, or children; (2) to an agency designated by the Secretary of the Treasury to handle applications for United States savings bonds, to purchase bonds for the seaman; and (3) for deposits to be made in an account for savings or investment opened by