§

Excel Rehabilitation and Nursing

12-CA-025117 (N.L.R.B. May. 13, 2009)
Excel Rehabilitation and Nursing

7 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 499 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Highlands Hosp. v. National Labor

    508 F.3d 28 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 15 times
    Affirming the Board's finding that a petition did not satisfy an employer's burden of proving an actual loss of majority support because one signatory's unequivocal post-petition demonstration of support for the union invalidated her signature and, without that signature, the petition lacked support of a majority of bargaining unit employees

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Williams Enterprises, Inc.

    50 F.3d 1280 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Upholding finding of causation where four months passed between company's anti-union statements and decertification petition

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pratt & Whitney Air Craft Division, United Technologies Corp.

    789 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 33 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer statement that the union was "thoughtless and irresponsible" and that it was on "a collision course" was neither coercive nor implied that employees should abandon the union

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Miller Waste Mills

    315 F.3d 951 (8th Cir. 2003)   Cited 8 times

    No. 01-3073. Submitted: October 7, 2002. Filed: January 10, 2003. David A. Seid, argued, Washington, DC (Sharon I. Block, Arthur F. Rosenfeld, John E. Higgins, Jr., John H. Ferguson, Aileen A. Armstrong, on the brief), for petitioner. Lee A. Lastovich, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Paul J. Zech, on the brief), for respondent. Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions this court to enforce its order

  7. Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    115 F.3d 636 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 94-70192, 94-70262 Argued and Submitted August 18, 1995 — San Francisco, California. Filed May 15, 1997 Robert G. Hulteng, Jeffrey S. Bosley, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy Mathiason, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner-cross-respondent, Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. Charles Donnelly, John J. Fawley, Washington, DC, for respondent-cross-petitioner, National Labor Relations Board. John J. Davis, Jr., McCarthy, Johnson Miller, San Francisco, CA, for respondent-intervenor, U.S. Local 350