§

Excalibur Charter School, Inc.

366 NLRB No. 49 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Excalibur Charter School, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natural Gas Utility District

    402 U.S. 600 (1971)   Cited 187 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding utility district was political subdivision under that standard

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  5. Kentucky River Community Care v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Determining that a nonprofit organization operating mental health facilities was not administered by individuals responsible to public officials or the general electorate despite the fact that Kentucky law required the board to "be representative of the community the corporation serves"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours

    750 F.2d 524 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times
    Finding that a supervisor's act of questioning an employee as to why he supported the union, as well as the supervisor's statement to the employee that he had supervisor potential if he did not support the union, rose to the level of coercive conduct

  7. Dawson Carbide Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    782 F.2d 64 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 85-5051, 85-5169. Argued January 6, 1986. Decided January 28, 1986. Wallace G. Long, argued, Barry L. King, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Karen Cordry, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N.L.R.B., Patrick V. McNamara, Detroit, Mich., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT, JONES and NELSON, Circuit Judges. MERRITT, Circuit