§

Ex Parte Tapily et al

14635806 - (D) (P.T.A.B. Jun. 5, 2019)
Ex Parte Tapily et al

3 Cited authorities

  1. Williamson v. Kincaid

    4 U.S. 20 (1800)   Cited 3 times

    FEBRUARY TERM, 1800. Ingersoll and Dallas, for the plaintiff in error. E. Tilghman, for the defendant in error. ERROR from the Circuit Court of Georgia. It appeared from the record, that " Marian Kincaid of Great Britain, widow, " demanded against John G. Williamson the one third of 300 "acres of land, c. in Chatham county, as dower. That the "tenant pleaded, 1st. The act of Georgia (passed the 1st of March "1778) attainting G. Kincaid (the demandant's late husband) "forfeiting his estate, and vesting

  2. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,166 times   492 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."

  3. Section 6 - Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 6   Cited 188 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Giving the Director authority to designate "at least 3 members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board" to review "[e]ach appeal, derivation proceeding, post-grant review, and inter partes review"