All State & Fed.
JX
Search the Law
Search
§
Help
Sign In
Back to
Results
Ex parte SRIVASTAVA et al.
08089320 - (D) (B.P.A.I. May. 29, 1998)
Copy Cite
Read
Read
Attorney Analyses
Analyses
Citing Briefs
Briefs
Citing Cases
Citing Cases
Cited Authorities
Cited Authorities
3
Ex parte SRIVASTAVA et al.
3
Cited authorities
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/S
108 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Cited 351 times
5 Legal Analyses
Holding a preliminary injunction should not issue if defendant raises a substantial question as to validity, enforceability, or infringement
In re Zletz
893 F.2d 319 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Cited 42 times
3 Legal Analyses
Holding that claims failing this test during prosecution must be rejected under § 112, ¶ 2
Section 112 - Specification
35 U.S.C. § 112
Cited 7,409 times
1059 Legal Analyses
Requiring patent applications to include a "specification" that provides, among other information, a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it