All State & Fed.
JX
Search the Law
Search
§
Help
Sign In
Back to
Results
Ex parte SRIVASTAVA et al.
08089320 (B.P.A.I. May. 29, 1998)
Copy Cite
Read
Read
Attorney Analyses
Analyses
Citing Briefs
Briefs
Citing Cases
Citing Cases
Cited Authorities
Cited Authorities
3
Ex parte SRIVASTAVA et al.
3
Cited authorities
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/S
108 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Cited 345 times
5 Legal Analyses
Holding a preliminary injunction should not issue if defendant raises a substantial question as to validity, enforceability, or infringement
In re Zletz
893 F.2d 319 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Cited 42 times
3 Legal Analyses
Holding that claims failing this test during prosecution must be rejected under § 112, ¶ 2
Section 112 - Specification
35 U.S.C. § 112
Cited 7,362 times
1046 Legal Analyses
Requiring patent applications to include a "specification" that provides, among other information, a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it