§

Ex Parte Powell et al

11652890 (P.T.A.B. May. 30, 2013)
Ex Parte Powell et al

3 Cited authorities

  1. The Lessee of Ashton v. Ashton

    1 U.S. 4 (1760)

    APRIL TERM, 1760. For the Plaintiff it was answered: 1st. That this was no present Devise, the Testator taking Notice that I.S. had no Son born by the Word first Heir Male, and using the Words when and paying. — 2d. That this Contingency was not too remote, because the Testator by the Words first Heir Male, must have meant first Son; and that such a Construction must be made as to carry the Intent of the Testator into Execution. — 3d. First Heir Male are Words of Purchase and Designatio Personæ,

  2. Section 112 - Specification

    35 U.S.C. § 112   Cited 7,409 times   1059 Legal Analyses
    Requiring patent applications to include a "specification" that provides, among other information, a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it

  3. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,159 times   489 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."