§

Ex parte NAGASHIMA

29030090 (B.P.A.I. May. 12, 1998)
Ex parte NAGASHIMA

3 Cited authorities

  1. In re Nalbandian

    661 F.2d 1214 (C.C.P.A. 1981)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding tweezer design obvious in light of prior art reference that contained vertical rather than horizontal fluting and straight rather than curved pincers

  2. Application of Bartlett

    300 F.2d 942 (C.C.P.A. 1962)   Cited 10 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6791. April 11, 1962. Edward J. Willey, New York City (Samuel Stearman, New York City, of counsel), for appellants. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C. (Jere W. Sears, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Com'r. of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. United States Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place of Judge O'CONNELL, pursuant to provisions of Section

  3. Section 102 - Conditions for patentability; novelty

    35 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 6,023 times   1024 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the grant of a patent to one who "did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented"