§

Ex Parte Mackles et al

12905803 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 7, 2013)
Ex Parte Mackles et al

5 Cited authorities

  1. In re Applied Materials, Inc.

    692 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 60 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the board correctly rejected claims as obvious where "there was no indication that obtaining the claimed dimensions was beyond the capabilities of one of ordinary skill in the art or produced any unexpectedly beneficial properties"

  2. In re Glatt Air Techniques

    630 F.3d 1026 (Fed. Cir. 2011)   Cited 11 times
    Stating that objective evidence of commercial success relating “only to a single embodiment” should be considered even if claim covers “multiple embodiments”

  3. In re Smith

    24 B.R. 3 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that the attorney-client privilege always passes to the trustee even if the debtor is an individual

  4. In re Tamarack Trail Co.

    23 B.R. 3 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1982)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that there are “three appraisal techniques ... available to appraisers,” two of which are the sales comparison and income capitalization approaches

  5. Section 1.75 - Claim(s)

    37 C.F.R. § 1.75   Cited 111 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth proper drafts for independent and dependent claims