Ex Parte Lakshmanan et al

2 Cited authorities

  1. Dayco Products, Inc. v. Total Containment

    329 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2003)   Cited 194 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that disclosure of the `196 application, filed in 1992, could have led to double patenting rejections in the applications that issued as the patents-in-suit, which all claim a 1989 filing date
  2. Section 41.50 - Decisions and other actions by the Board

    37 C.F.R. § 41.50   Cited 34 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Requiring petitioners to raise the Board's failure to designate a new ground of rejection in a timely request for rehearing