Ex Parte Houle et al

7 Cited authorities

  1. Application of Weber

    580 F.2d 455 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 8 times

    Appeal No. 77-622. June 30, 1978. David R. Murphy, Arlington, Va., attorney of record, for appellants, Charles A. Wendel, Harold C. Wegner, Arlington, Va., on behalf of the Patent, Trademark and Copyright Section, Virginia State Bar. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Fred E. McKelvey, Woodbridge, Va., for the Patent and Trademark Office. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE

  2. In re Haas

    486 F.2d 1053 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 12 times

    Patent Appeal No. 9136. November 1, 1973. Sheldon W. Rothstein, Brown Mikulka, Cambridge, Mass., attorneys of record, for appellant; Donald R. Dunner, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Ellsworth H. Mosher, Arlington, Va., for amicus curiae. Joseph F. Nakanura, Acting Sol., for the Commissioner of Patents. Appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and ALMOND, Senior Judge. MARKEY, Chief Judge. This appeal is from the dismissal by the Board of

  3. In re Haas

    580 F.2d 461 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 5 times

    Appeal No. 78-536. June 30, 1978. Stanley H. Mervis, Cambridge, Mass., attorney of record, for appellant. Charles A. Wendel, Arlington, Va., Karl F. Jorda, Ardsley, N.Y., Harold C. Wegner, Arlington, Va., attorneys of record, for American Patent of Law Assn., amicus curiae, Earl L. Tyner, Arlington, Va., Harry E. Westlake, Jr., Rahway, N. J., of counsel. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Fred E. McKelvey, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the United States

  4. Section 121 - Divisional applications

    35 U.S.C. § 121   Cited 218 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that "the other invention [can be] made the subject of a divisional application"
  5. Section 134 - Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 134   Cited 98 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) PATENT APPLICANT.-An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) PATENT OWNER.-A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. 35 U.S.C. § 134 July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98-622

  6. Section 1.181 - Petition to the Director

    37 C.F.R. § 1.181   Cited 52 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Allowing for petitions invoking the Director's supervisory authority
  7. Section 1.142 - Requirement for restriction

    37 C.F.R. § 1.142   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Discussing requirement for restriction