§

Ex Parte BONNEFOIS et al

14622402 - (D) (P.T.A.B. Jan. 30, 2019)
Ex Parte BONNEFOIS et al

7 Cited authorities

  1. In re Swenson

    30 C.C.P.A. 809 (C.C.P.A. 1943)   Cited 11 times

    No. 4766. December 1, 1942. Rehearing Denied January 29, 1943. Appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals, Serial No. 383,168. Proceedings in the matter of the application of George W. Swenson and another for a patent. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming decision of Primary Examiner rejecting certain claims of the application, the applicants appeal. Affirmed. Harold J. Kinney, of St. Paul, Minn. (Charles S. Grindle, of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for

  2. In re Cooper

    134 F.2d 630 (C.C.P.A. 1943)   Cited 8 times

    Patent Appeal No. 4706. March 1, 1943. Appeal from the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, Serial No. 378,354. [Affirmed] Proceeding in the matter of the application of Frederick Cooper and another for a patent. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by primary examiner of certain claims the applicants appeal. Affirmed. Busser Harding, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Frank S. Busser, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.

  3. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,129 times   479 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."

  4. Section 6 - Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 6   Cited 186 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Giving the Director authority to designate "at least 3 members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board" to review "[e]ach appeal, derivation proceeding, post-grant review, and inter partes review"

  5. Section 134 - Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 134   Cited 98 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) PATENT APPLICANT.-An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) PATENT OWNER.-A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. 35 U.S.C. § 134 July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98-622

  6. Section 371 - National stage: Commencement

    35 U.S.C. § 371   Cited 52 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Referring to the "requirements" in specific "subsection"

  7. Section 1.136 - Extensions of time

    37 C.F.R. § 1.136   Cited 17 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) If an applicant is required to reply within a nonstatutory or shortened statutory time period, applicant may extend the time period for reply up to the earlier of the expiration of any maximum period set by statute or five months after the time period set for reply, if a petition for an extension of time and the fee set in § 1.17(a) are filed, unless: (i) Applicant is notified otherwise in an Office action; (ii) The reply is a reply brief submitted pursuant to § 41.41 of this title; (iii)