§

Ex Parte 7785302 et al

95002089 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 28, 2019)
Ex Parte 7785302 et al

3 Cited authorities

  1. Angiodynamics, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

    1:17-cv-00598 (BKS/CFH) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2018)   Cited 1 times

    1:17-cv-00598 (BKS/CFH) 08-06-2018 ANGIODYNAMICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff: Boies Schiller Flexner LLP Philip J. Iovieno Adam R. Shaw Anne M. Nardacci Jenna C. Smith 30 South Pearl Street, 11th Floor Albany, NY 12207 Nicholas A. Gravante, Jr. 575 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10022 For Defendants: O'Melveny & Myers LLP Andrew J. Frackman Edward N. Moss 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Harris Beach PLLC James

  2. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,157 times   488 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."

  3. Section 1.956 - Patent owner extensions of time in inter partes reexamination

    37 C.F.R. § 1.956   Cited 1 times

    The time for taking any action by a patent owner in an inter partes reexamination proceeding will be extended only for sufficient cause and for a reasonable time specified. Any request for such extension must be filed on or before the day on which action by the patent owner is due, but in no case will the mere filing of a request effect any extension. Any request for such extension must be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in § 1.17(g) . See § 1.304(a) for extensions of time for filing a