§

Ex Parte 6,654,505 B2 et al

95001292 - (R) (P.T.A.B. Sep. 20, 2013)
Ex Parte 6,654,505 B2 et al

3 Cited authorities

  1. Playtex Products, Inc. v. Procter Gamble

    400 F.3d 901 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that the district court's construction of the term "substantially flattened surfaces" improperly "introduce[d] a numerical tolerance to the flatness"

  2. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,056 times   449 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."

  3. Section 41.79 - Rehearing

    37 C.F.R. § 41.79   Cited 5 times

    (a) Parties to the appeal may file a request for rehearing of the decision within one month of the date of: (1) The original decision of the Board under § 41.77(a) , (2) The original § 41.77(b) decision under the provisions of § 41.77(b)(2) , (3) The expiration of the time for the owner to take action under § 41.77(b)(2) , or (4) The new decision of the Board under § 41.77(f) . (b) (1) The request for rehearing must state with particularity the points believed to have been misapprehended or overlooked