§

Ex Parte 6297751 et al

90009368 (B.P.A.I. Jan. 30, 2012)
Ex Parte 6297751 et al

6 Cited authorities

  1. Atlas Powder Company v. Ireco Incorporated

    190 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 163 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding asserted claims covering air mixed into an explosive composition anticipated by prior art that necessarily also contained air as claimed, even though benefits of the air were not recognized

  2. Fenner Investments v. Microsoft

    369 F. App'x 132 (Fed. Cir. 2010)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 2009-1496. March 15, 2010. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07-CV-00008, Judge Leonard Davis. Before NEWMAN, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. The judgment in this case is affirmed. We uphold the district court's grant of summary judgment of no infringement based on the court's determination that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that no reasonable jury could find that the accused devices of Microsoft and

  3. Section 102 - Conditions for patentability; novelty

    35 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 6,022 times   1024 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the grant of a patent to one who "did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented"

  4. Section 134 - Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 134   Cited 98 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) PATENT APPLICANT.-An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) PATENT OWNER.-A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. 35 U.S.C. § 134 July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98-622

  5. Section 306 - Appeal

    35 U.S.C. § 306   Cited 42 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a petitioner can appeal adverse decisions to the Federal Circuit after reexaminations are complete

  6. Section 41.37 - Appeal brief

    37 C.F.R. § 41.37   Cited 32 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Requiring identification of support in specification and, for means-plus-function limitations, corresponding structure as well