§

Ex Parte 5684863 et al

90008095 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 27, 2012)
Ex Parte 5684863 et al

4 Cited authorities

  1. In re Katz Interactive Call Proc. Patent

    639 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2011)   Cited 282 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is "not necessary to disclose more structure than the general purpose processor that performs those functions" because such functions are "coextensive with the structure disclosed."

  2. Katz v. AT&T Corp.

    63 F. Supp. 2d 583 (E.D. Pa. 1999)   Cited 23 times
    Construing Claim 192 of U.S. Patent No. 5,561,707, which is nearly identical to Claim 18 of the '547 Patent

  3. Section 1.550 - Conduct of ex parte reexamination proceedings

    37 C.F.R. § 1.550   Cited 32 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Discussing limited involvement of requester and third parties in re-examination proceedings

  4. Section 41.52 - Rehearing

    37 C.F.R. § 41.52   Cited 7 times   9 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) Appellant may file a single request for rehearing within two months of the date of the original decision of the Board. No request for rehearing from a decision on rehearing will be permitted, unless the rehearing decision so modified the original decision as to become, in effect, a new decision, and the Board states that a second request for rehearing would be permitted. The request for rehearing must state with particularity the points believed to have been misapprehended or overlooked by