Ex-Cell-O Corp.

55 Cited authorities

Edison Co. v. Labor Board
305 U.S. 197 (1938) Cited 19,289 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
Consolo v. Federal Maritime Comm'n
383 U.S. 607 (1966) Cited 3,610 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that even if two inconsistent conclusions may be drawn from the evidence, the agency's interpretation may be supported by substantial evidence
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.
327 U.S. 251 (1946) Cited 985 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"
Boire v. Greyhound Corp.
376 U.S. 473 (1964) Cited 426 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Co.
282 U.S. 555 (1931) Cited 1,110 times
Holding that although damages must be "the certain result of the wrong," they may be "uncertain in respect of their amount."
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,315 times 84 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,059 times 23 Legal Analyses
Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Ex-Cell-O Corp.

55 Cited authorities

Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

Holding that even if two inconsistent conclusions may be drawn from the evidence, the agency's interpretation may be supported by substantial evidence

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"

Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that although damages must be "the certain result of the wrong," they may be "uncertain in respect of their amount."

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"