Every Woman'S Place, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Metropolitan Ins. Co.

    380 U.S. 438 (1965)   Cited 180 times
    In Metropolitan Ins. Co., supra, at 444, we made it clear that "`courts may not accept appellate counsel's post hoc rationalizations for agency action.'"
  2. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Indianapolis Mack Sales Service

    802 F.2d 280 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 26 times
    In Indianapolis Mack, the employer contracted with a nationwide business to acquire the latter's subsidiary's Indianapolis factory. 802 F.2d at 282.
  4. Dayton Typographic Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 25 times
    Finding the employer's "lack of work" defense unconvincing where the employer hired two new employees to do part-time work in the same department as the discharged employee
  5. ARO, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    596 F.2d 713 (6th Cir. 1979)   Cited 33 times
    In ARO, Inc. v. NLRB, 596 F.2d 713, 718 (6th Cir. 1979), this court held, "For an individual claim or complaint to amount to concerted action under the Act it must... be made with the object of inducing or preparing for group action...."
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 925

    460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972)   Cited 37 times

    No. 71-2158. May 17, 1972. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Stanley R. Zirkin, Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: The

  7. Intern. Ass'n of Bridge v. N.L.R.B

    792 F.2d 241 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 11 times

    No. 85-1194. Argued April 22, 1986. Decided June 10, 1986. Roger N. Gold, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. John G. Elligers, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John H. Ferguson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCALIA and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SCALIA. Opinion concurring

  8. JMC Transport, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    776 F.2d 612 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 84-5960, 84-6060. Argued August 22, 1985. Decided November 12, 1985. D. Patton Pelfrey, Charles E. Allen, III (argued), Brown, Todd and Heyburn, James H. Massey, Mark B. Davis, Jr., Louisville, Ky., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Elinor Stillman (argued), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge. MERRITT, Circuit Judge

  9. Mary Carter Paint Co. v. F.T.C

    333 F.2d 654 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    In Mary Carter Paint Co. v. F.T.C., 333 F.2d 654 (5 Cir. 1964), this Court reversed an order of the Federal Trade Commission on the ground that the Commission had departed from its previously established rule.
  10. Restaurant Corp. of America v. N.L.R.B

    801 F.2d 1390 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 2 times

    No. 84-1475. Argued September 13, 1985. Decided September 26, 1986. As Modified December 8, 1986. Timothy J. O'Rourke, with whom Marshall F. Berman and Michael A. Pace, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Marc B. Seidman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an