Evening Post Publishing Co.

Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Sonoco Products Company v. N.L.R.B
399 F.2d 835 (9th Cir. 1968) Cited 15 times
No. 21939. August 7, 1968. E. Judge Elderkin (argued), William R. Irwin, of Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Gary Green (argued), Atty., N.L.R.B., Joseph A. Yablonski, Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., Gladstein, Anderson, Leonard Sibbett, Neyhart Grodin, San Francisco, Cal., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and CROCKER, District Judge. Hon. M.D. Crocker