§

Evenflow Transportation Management

358 N.L.R.B. 695 (N.L.R.B. 2012)
Evenflow Transportation Management

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 656 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    804 F.2d 808 (3d Cir. 1986)   Cited 429 times
    Timing and departure from past practice indicates unlawful motive

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  5. Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    2 F.3d 1162 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming bargaining order where company's "large number of unfair labor practices, . . . committed by some of the top officials in the company, and . . . directed at numerous employees . . . instilled a strong fear of union representation in the employees."

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Intersweet, Inc.

    125 F.3d 1064 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 9 times
    Underscoring severity of employer's actions and "continuity in management"

  8. Dillingham Marine Mfg. Co., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    610 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times

    No. 79-1029. January 24, 1980. Threadgill Smith, Taylor B. Smith, Columbus, Miss., for petitioner cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Edward S. Dorsey, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent cross-petitioner. On Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before AINSWORTH, VANCE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. R. LANIER ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This case comes before us for review of the Decision