§

Eugene Iovine, Inc.

353 N.L.R.B. 400 (N.L.R.B. 2008)
Eugene Iovine, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  4. Dorsey Trailers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    233 F.3d 831 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that as long as employer decision requires capital expenditure, decision is outside duty to bargain

  5. Local 512, Warehouse & Office Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    795 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 36 times
    In Local 512 v. NLRB ("Felbro"), 795 F.2d 705, 722 (9th Cir. 1986), the Ninth Circuit reached this holding after observing that " Sure-Tan gave no indication that it was overruling a significant line of precedent that disregards a discriminatee's legal status, as opposed to availability to work, in determining his or her eligibility for back pay."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Pan American Grain Co., Inc.

    432 F.3d 69 (1st Cir. 2005)   Cited 4 times
    Noting that the court did not "understand the [NLRB's] rationale" and that while the Board's "result may or may not be sound, . . . until we understand its basis, we cannot effectively review it"

  7. Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    912 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Advertisers Mfg. Co.

    823 F.2d 1086 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer violated Section 8 in terminating supervisory employee in retaliation for her son's rights to engage in concerted activities

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Pan American Grain Co., Inc.

    448 F.3d 465 (1st Cir. 2006)   Cited 1 times

    No. 05-1274. Submitted November 10, 2005. Decided May 31, 2006. Ruperto J. Robles and Rafael J. Lopez on brief for respondent/cross-petitioner. Arthur F. Rosenfeld, Acting General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, Margery E. Lieber, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Meredith L. Jason and Christopher W. Young on brief for petitioner/cross-respondent. Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, SELYA, Circuit Judge, and STAHL, Senior Circuit

  10. Porta-King Bldg. Systems v. N.L.R.B

    14 F.3d 1258 (8th Cir. 1994)   Cited 9 times
    Finding employer failed to make clear and unmistakable showing that union waived its right to bargain over layoffs