§

ETS OILFIELD SERVICES, L.P.

16-CA-172847 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 23, 2016)
ETS OILFIELD SERVICES, L.P.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 279 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 457 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

  3. Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

    834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)   Cited 147 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Holding arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims violate the NLRA and fall within the FAA's saving clause

  4. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 142 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

  5. Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp.

    823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016)   Cited 124 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act

  6. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 318 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  7. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

  8. Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    746 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2014)   Cited 31 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8

  9. Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

  10. Chesapeake Energy Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    633 F. App'x 613 (5th Cir. 2016)   Cited 3 times

    No. 15-60326 02-12-2016 CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION, and its wholly owned subsidiary Chesapeake Operating, Incorporated, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. PER CURIAM Summary Calendar On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board NLRB No. 14-CA-100530 Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

  11. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,302 times   211 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself