Etiwan Fertilizer Co.
5 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Diaz v. United States
223 U.S. 442 (1912) Cited 850 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that double jeopardy was not implicated when a defendant was tried for assault, then subsequently tried for murder after the victim of the assault passed away a few weeks later
Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.
311 U.S. 584 (1941) Cited 338 timesFinding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
American Rubber Prod. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
214 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1954) Cited 12 timesRelying upon Diaz
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant
207 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 9 timesNo. 12985. September 15, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Morris A. Solomon, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Raymond S. Smathurst, Washington, D.C., J.P. Stirling, Roscoe Watts, John T. Casey, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before HEALY, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, requests enforcement